Up to date
Published
3 min read

Trevor I. Lasn

Staff Software Engineer, Engineering Manager

The 5:1 Rule: Effective Performance Reviews For High-Performing Teams

Research reveals the ideal ratio of positive to negative feedback within high performing teams

A study by Emily Heaphy and Marcial Losada examined how feedback patterns relate to team performance. Their research of 60 business teams found a correlation between team effectiveness and the ratio of positive to negative comments shared among team members.

PerformanceFeedback RatioComments
High-performing teams(Positive) 5.6:1 (Negative)Nearly six positive comments for each negative one
Medium-performing teams(Positive) 1.9:1 (Negative)Almost twice as many positive as negative comments
Low-performing teams(Positive) 0.36:1 (Negative)Nearly three negative comments for every positive one

Most organizations structure performance reviews with a roughly equal balance of positive and negative feedback. Some even follow the “sandwich method” - positive, negative, positive - creating a 2:1 ratio at best. According to the research, this approach falls significantly short of what drives optimal performance.

The 5:1 ratio isn’t arbitrary - it’s rooted in how our brains process different types of feedback during evaluation scenarios.

When employees receive criticism in a performance review, their brain’s threat response activates. The amygdala triggers stress hormones that narrow focus and put the employee in a defensive posture. This neurological response makes it difficult for them to fully process additional feedback or engage in productive discussion about growth opportunities.

Positive feedback, by contrast, activates the brain’s reward system. With sufficient positive reinforcement, employees experience dopamine release that enhances their receptivity to learning and growth discussions. This neurological state makes them more likely to engage constructively with improvement areas rather than defensively.

The 5:1 ratio creates a neurological environment where employees can remain open to critical feedback without becoming defensive or disengaged. It establishes psychological safety that makes performance reviews genuinely productive.

Applying the 5:1 Rule to Underperforming Employees

Managers often struggle with how to maintain the 5:1 ratio when reviewing genuinely underperforming employees. It can seem impossible or even dishonest to provide five positive comments for every critical one when someone is missing targets or causing problems.

For employees with multiple performance issues, spreading feedback across several conversations can maintain the ratio while still addressing all concerns over time. This approach prevents overwhelming the employee with criticism and gives them opportunity to make incremental improvements.

The 5:1 approach doesn’t mean ignoring or minimizing performance problems. Rather, it creates a psychological environment where employees can actually hear and implement critical feedback instead of becoming defensive. By maintaining the ratio even in difficult circumstances, managers increase the likelihood that their feedback will lead to genuine performance improvement rather than disengagement.


Found this article helpful? You might enjoy my free newsletter. I share dev tips and insights to help you grow your coding skills and advance your tech career.

Interested in supporting this blog in exchange for a shoutout? Get in touch.


Liked this post?

Check out these related articles that might be useful for you. They cover similar topics and provide additional insights.

Reflections
5 min read

Minimum Viable Documentation

How to create essential documentation that actually gets read and used.

Sep 27, 2024
Read article
Reflections
7 min read

Technical Debt Is Killing Your Business

And it will be your downfall if you choose to ignore it

Jul 31, 2024
Read article
Reflections
5 min read

Attracting Top Engineering Talent to Your Startup

Advice on competing for great software engineers without name recognition

Sep 21, 2024
Read article
Reflections
6 min read

The Monday Morning Test to Measure Engineering Team Health

Why the first day back can reveal everything about your engineering team's health

Nov 4, 2024
Read article
Reflections
3 min read

Internal Mobility

Just like a utility player on a sports team discovering their ideal position, internal mobility allows you to explore different areas of engineering and find your true passion.

Sep 23, 2024
Read article
Reflections
7 min read

The Real Cost of Meetings: What FAANG Companies Do Differently

Discover how FAANG companies like Amazon, Google, and Netflix reduce the hidden costs of meetings by embracing written communication and minimizing unnecessary gatherings.

Sep 17, 2024
Read article
Reflections
5 min read

When Should You Actually Worry About Tech Debt?

Technical debt isn't the monster under your bed, but it can become one if ignored too long.

Sep 12, 2024
Read article
Reflections
4 min read

A Great Product Doesn't Need Marketing

Great products speak for themselves, without the need for massive marketing campaigns

Sep 18, 2024
Read article
Reflections
7 min read

Evolve or Become Irrelevant

Why staying relevant in tech means constantly adapting to new technologies and trends

Sep 15, 2024
Read article

This article was originally published on https://www.trevorlasn.com/blog/the-5-1-rule. It was written by a human and polished using grammar tools for clarity.